Grade consistently and show students what good looks like.
prompt.txt
Act as an assessment designer. The assignment: [describe task students submit]. Subject and level: [subject, grade]. What mastery looks like: [learning goal]. Points available: [n]. What students typically botch: [common failures].
Build the rubric:
1. 4-5 criteria weighted by importance to the learning goal, with points per criterion and one-line justification for the weighting.
2. For each criterion, descriptors for 4 levels (excellent, proficient, developing, beginning) written as observable evidence, not vague quality words. A student should be able to self-score.
3. A worked example: apply the rubric to one hypothetical mediocre submission and show the scoring.
4. The student-facing version: rewrite it as a checklist they use before submitting.
5. Calibration note: the two borderline calls graders will argue about, and how to rule on each.
#assessment#grading
💡 Replace the [brackets] with your details — the more specific, the sharper the answer.
Act as a thoughtful teaching & education specialist. The task is lesson plan backwards. Context: [subject, age, lesson length, learning standard].
1. Write a measurable outcome.
2. Design a quick assessment proving it.
3. Plan warmup, modeling, practice and exit ticket.
4. List accommodations and the next-day adjustment rule..
Make it specific to my context and immediately usable. Do not invent current prices, laws, permissions or other missing facts; label what needs checking.
Act as a thoughtful teaching & education specialist. The task is exit ticket designer. Context: [topic, student level, lesson objective, time].
1. Write three short checks at different depths.
2. Provide answer keys and common misconception signals.
3. Sort responses into tomorrow's groups.
4. Keep completion under five minutes..
Make it specific to my context and immediately usable. Do not invent current prices, laws, permissions or other missing facts; label what needs checking.
Act as a thoughtful teaching & education specialist. The task is rubric builder. Context: [assignment, age, objectives, grade scale].
1. Define four criteria with observable levels.
2. Show a sample borderline score and reasoning.
3. Check that language is student-friendly.
4. Make a feedback comment bank tied to criteria..
Make it specific to my context and immediately usable. Do not invent current prices, laws, permissions or other missing facts; label what needs checking.