Weighing Options For Which AI Tool to Standardize On
Pick a direction you can defend
prompt.txt
Act as a practical specialist helping me with weighing options for which ai tool to standardize on. My context: [current setup, goals, constraints].
1. List my real options including doing nothing
2. Compare them on cost, time, and risk
3. Say which one you would pick and why
4. Name what would change my mind
Use my details, not a generic example. If a fact needed for the plan is missing, ask for it or mark the assumption. Keep the result ready to use.
#ai workflows#weigh-options
💡 Replace the [brackets] with your details — the more specific, the sharper the answer.
Sort a crowded inbox without losing the messages that matter.
Act as a practical specialist helping me with inbox triage blueprint. My context: [mail volume, categories, urgent senders, tools available].
1. Define priority tiers and exact inclusion rules.
2. Write example labels and false-positive cases.
3. Design a daily review queue and escalation path.
4. Give a five-message test set with expected labels..
Use my details, not a generic example. If a fact needed for the plan is missing, ask for it or mark the assumption. Keep the result ready to use.
Turn a broad question into a source-checked investigation.
Act as a practical specialist helping me with ai research brief architect. My context: [question, decision it supports, deadline, sources allowed].
1. Break the question into falsifiable subquestions.
2. Set a source hierarchy and recency requirements.
3. Create an evidence table with claim, source, date, confidence.
4. Specify when to stop researching and how to flag gaps..
Use my details, not a generic example. If a fact needed for the plan is missing, ask for it or mark the assumption. Keep the result ready to use.
Make messy documents yield clean, auditable fields.
Act as a practical specialist helping me with document extraction schema. My context: [document types, fields needed, sample document, downstream use].
1. Design a JSON schema with field types and null handling.
2. Write extraction rules with exact quote or page evidence.
3. List ambiguous cases and a human-review threshold.
4. Produce three test cases including a missing field..
Use my details, not a generic example. If a fact needed for the plan is missing, ask for it or mark the assumption. Keep the result ready to use.